GMCforum
For enthusiast of the Classic GMC Motorhome built from 1973 to 1978. A web-based mirror of the GMCnet mailing list.

Home » Public Forums » GMCnet » PowerNation TV bashes the Qjet
PowerNation TV bashes the Qjet [message #238477] Sun, 02 February 2014 09:19 Go to next message
JohnL455 is currently offline  JohnL455   United States
Messages: 4447
Registered: October 2006
Location: Woodstock, IL
Karma: 12
Senior Member
First they bashed the Qjet for a couple minutes then went on to abandon it for a crusty Carter AFB. Putting a square to spread bore adaptor plate on is like a NASCAR restrictor plate on the primary side. They don't get the whole Qjet small primary venturi speed efficiency thing to say the least. Oy

John Lebetski
Woodstock, IL
77 Eleganza II
Re: PowerNation TV bashes the Qjet [message #238484 is a reply to message #238477] Sun, 02 February 2014 10:12 Go to previous messageGo to next message
mrgmc3 is currently offline  mrgmc3   United States
Messages: 210
Registered: September 2013
Location: W Washington
Karma: 2
Senior Member
Typically the people who bash Qjets don't understand Qjets.

Chris Geils - Twin Cities / W Wa 1978 26' Kingsley w/ very few mods; PD9040, aux trans cooler, one repaint in stock colors, R134a, Al rad, Alcoas, 54k mi
Re: PowerNation TV bashes the Qjet [message #238485 is a reply to message #238477] Sun, 02 February 2014 10:19 Go to previous messageGo to next message
Cadillackeeper is currently offline  Cadillackeeper   United States
Messages: 464
Registered: October 2012
Location: Fort Lauderdale
Karma: 1
Senior Member
The majority of people in general Are stupid.Ignorance is bliss.
Its like the folks that spend 200k on an SOB.then try to get $20k for it a few years later.


77 455 Elaganza II and 67 Animal, Built 500 Powered Eldo
Re: PowerNation TV bashes the Qjet [message #238486 is a reply to message #238477] Sun, 02 February 2014 10:22 Go to previous messageGo to next message
roy1 is currently offline  roy1   United States
Messages: 2126
Registered: July 2004
Location: Minden nevada
Karma: 6
Senior Member
JohnL455 wrote on Sun, 02 February 2014 07:19

First they bashed the Qjet for a couple minutes then went on to abandon it for a crusty Carter AFB. Putting a square to spread bore adaptor plate on is like a NASCAR restrictor plate on the primary side. They don't get the whole Qjet small primary venturi speed efficiency thing to say the least. Oy


AFB's are nice carburators on a square bore manifold but I wouldn't want one on the motor home in place of the quaddrojet they are great on street rods.


Roy Keen Minden,NV 76 X Glenbrook
Re: [GMCnet] PowerNation TV bashes the Qjet [message #238490 is a reply to message #238486] Sun, 02 February 2014 10:49 Go to previous messageGo to next message
James Hupy is currently offline  James Hupy   United States
Messages: 6806
Registered: May 2010
Karma: -62
Senior Member
A shop towel soaked in gasoline held above an open intake manifold can be
used to make an engine run. How well depends upon a long list of variables,
not the least is the skill of the rag holder. All carburetors mix air and
fuel and control engine speed. Some do it better than others do. A qjet is
no better or worse at this than several other brands. They do have HUGE
secondaries, and if they tip in too soon or too late they present their
own unique set of problems. What they seldom do is go lean at wide open
throttle like several other brands renown to do. I consider that to be a
positive thing as lean mixtures at W.O.T. will destroy a good engine pretty
quickly. Cadillac used a Rochester 4 barrel with 4 equal sized throttle
bores in the 49 - 62 or so era. That was a great carb, trouble free,
tunable, but made of pot metal. Alcohol fuels will destroy one over time.
As far as tuning goes, (if you understand it well) it is hard to beat a
well set up electronic fuel injection system that has the EBL controls
along with knock sensor and computer controlled ignition timing. But, if
you are somewhere east of Kansas City in the middle of Cornfield County,
and your high zoot electronic system goes south on you, Estes and Buford
are not going to get you back on the road easily. No perfect setup. Just
what I think anyway.
Jim Hupy
Salem, Or
78 GMC Royale 403
On Feb 2, 2014 8:22 AM, <roy@gmcnet.org> wrote:

>
>
> JohnL455 wrote on Sun, 02 February 2014 07:19
> > First they bashed the Qjet for a couple minutes then went on to abandon
> it for a crusty Carter AFB. Putting a square to spread bore adaptor plate
> on is like a NASCAR restrictor plate on the primary side. They don't get
> the whole Qjet small primary venturi speed efficiency thing to say the
> least. Oy
>
>
> AFB's are nice carburators on a square bore manifold but I wouldn't want
> one on the motor home in place of the quaddrojet they are great on street
> rods.
> --
> Roy Keen
> Minden,NV
> 76 X Glenbrook
> _______________________________________________
> GMCnet mailing list
> Unsubscribe or Change List Options:
> http://temp.gmcnet.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/gmclist
>
_______________________________________________
GMCnet mailing list
Unsubscribe or Change List Options:
http://temp.gmcnet.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/gmclist

Re: [GMCnet] PowerNation TV bashes the Qjet [message #238495 is a reply to message #238490] Sun, 02 February 2014 11:32 Go to previous messageGo to next message
Otterwan   United States
Messages: 946
Registered: July 2013
Location: Lynnwood (north of Seattl...
Karma: 0
Senior Member
When I had had my 1970 GMC with a 396 I ran various carbs on it: The stock QJet, and AFB, a ThermoQuad, even an old 4GC. They all worked (although the 4GC didn't flow enough) but I always went back to the QJet for performance and reliability.

1977 Birchaven, Lynnwood WA - "We may not be able to stop all evil in the world, but I know that how we treat one another is entirely up to us."
Re: PowerNation TV bashes the Qjet [message #238512 is a reply to message #238477] Sun, 02 February 2014 12:41 Go to previous messageGo to next message
kerry pinkerton is currently offline  kerry pinkerton   United States
Messages: 2565
Registered: July 2012
Location: Harvest, Al
Karma: 15
Senior Member
I learned about Qjets via Mopar Thermoquad. Same principal, spread bore, small primaries, and huge secondaries.

Being new to GMC's I was amazed that I was getting 12mpg average on several trips. Few here believed me but I checked it about a dozen ways and it was right. ( normally run around 60 which helps with mileage no doubt )

When we finally got to Branson after struggling up the mountains, I was whining about lack of power and someone asked if my secondaries were opening up. Turns out they were not for several reasons.

NOW, if I keep my foot out of it and stay on the primaries I get great mileage but when I get on it I can hear it moan and know my instantaneous mileage just dropped to about 3. Laughing

My wife had a 97 Supercharged Gran Prix. The fun meter showed boost and it had the gas mileage display. I always was amazed that it would run like the proverbial bat out of hell but get 31 on the interstate if you kept your foot out of the boost. It always bugged her that whatever her average MPG was I'd bring it up a good bit just by my driving habits. Twisted Evil

I'm thinking of wiring up a light that comes on when linkage moves to the point that the secondaries open.

I really had no real complaints driving on primaries only until I got to the mountains.

I love my Qjet.


Kerry Pinkerton - North Alabama Had 5 over the years. Currently have a '06 Fleetwood Discovery 39L
Re: PowerNation TV bashes the Qjet [message #238513 is a reply to message #238512] Sun, 02 February 2014 12:53 Go to previous messageGo to next message
Otterwan   United States
Messages: 946
Registered: July 2013
Location: Lynnwood (north of Seattl...
Karma: 0
Senior Member
Kerry, there is something immensely satisfying about that QJet secondary roar. It's a sound from my younger days. The next time an SOB pulls up beside you on the freeway, look him in they eye and floor it.


..rrrRRRRAWRRRRRRRRRR!!!!!


1977 Birchaven, Lynnwood WA - "We may not be able to stop all evil in the world, but I know that how we treat one another is entirely up to us."
Re: PowerNation TV bashes the Qjet [message #238518 is a reply to message #238477] Sun, 02 February 2014 13:26 Go to previous messageGo to next message
JohnL455 is currently offline  JohnL455   United States
Messages: 4447
Registered: October 2006
Location: Woodstock, IL
Karma: 12
Senior Member
Yeah Qjets are remarkably simple if understood. They tore down that AFB onTV with 2 floats and springs and weights and levers Yikes. My point is that the Rochester guys designed it to work on SBCs to Cad500s with minor differences. The thing to remember is that 99.9% of the time you are driving on the 'small carb ' primaries with super high velocities, yet you have the CFM if needed on demand. A simple secondary air valve tension adjustment will solve most bog issues, the biggest complaint. For the TZE miles I drive, EFI is a no recoop situation

John Lebetski
Woodstock, IL
77 Eleganza II
Re: [GMCnet] PowerNation TV bashes the Qjet [message #238522 is a reply to message #238513] Sun, 02 February 2014 13:42 Go to previous messageGo to next message
kelvin is currently offline  kelvin   United States
Messages: 608
Registered: February 2004
Location: Eugene, OR
Karma: 0
Senior Member
On 2/2/2014 10:53 AM, David Orders wrote:
>
> Kerry, there is something immensely satisfying about that QJet secondary roar. It's a sound from my younger days. The next time an SOB pulls up beside you on the freeway, look him in they eye and floor it.
>
>
> ..rrrRRRRAWRRRRRRRRRR!!!!!

Remove the hatch. Remove the air cleaner. Go "tuning" with a friend
sitting on the steps. It is an awesome sound.

We went back home and got earplugs after a few minutes of that.
You do worry about loose objects in the coach being ingested...


_______________________________________________
GMCnet mailing list
Unsubscribe or Change List Options:
http://temp.gmcnet.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/gmclist

Re: PowerNation TV bashes the Qjet [message #238543 is a reply to message #238477] Sun, 02 February 2014 15:58 Go to previous messageGo to next message
GeorgeRud is currently offline  GeorgeRud   United States
Messages: 1380
Registered: February 2007
Location: Chicago, IL
Karma: 0
Senior Member
Though I've grown up with carburetors in many of my vehicles, I wonder if converting to EFI may not be the way to move forward. Between the ethanol in the fuel eating up components, and the aging of the population that grew up with carbs, we may soon find that Cletus and Co. only know how to troubleshoot and fix EFI systems in a few years. The more I read and learn about them, the simpler they seem. Only problem is that they don't always have a 'limp home' mode yet.

Time will tell, and it would miss the roar of those secondaries opening!


George Rudawsky
Chicago, IL
75 Palm Beach
Re: PowerNation TV bashes the Qjet [message #238562 is a reply to message #238512] Sun, 02 February 2014 17:58 Go to previous messageGo to next message
A Hamilto is currently offline  A Hamilto   United States
Messages: 4508
Registered: April 2011
Karma: 39
Senior Member
Kerry Pinkerton wrote on Sun, 02 February 2014 12:41

...My wife had a 97 Supercharged Gran Prix. The fun meter showed boost and it had the gas mileage display. I always was amazed that it would run like the proverbial bat out of hell but get 31 on the interstate if you kept your foot out of the boost. It always bugged her that whatever her average MPG was I'd bring it up a good bit just by my driving habits. ...
I estimate I get between and 15 and 35% better mileage than my CFO just by the way I drive. And it shows on the display. But she doesn't care, so she never even looks at it.

Yankees drive that way. Your neck snaps back when the light turns green, and snaps forward when they get right on top of the next red light before they stomp on the brakes.

It's like they are trying to get a heart attack victim to the hospital ALL THE TIME.
Re: PowerNation TV bashes the Qjet [message #238574 is a reply to message #238477] Sun, 02 February 2014 19:01 Go to previous messageGo to next message
WildBill   Canada
Messages: 232
Registered: January 2014
Karma: 1
Senior Member
Really like quadrajets. Rebuilt and tuned hundreds of them over the years. Loved the flat rate time too! Know the problem areas and fixes. Don't have anything bad to say about them!
Re: PowerNation TV bashes the Qjet [message #238605 is a reply to message #238477] Mon, 03 February 2014 09:11 Go to previous messageGo to next message
JohnL455 is currently offline  JohnL455   United States
Messages: 4447
Registered: October 2006
Location: Woodstock, IL
Karma: 12
Senior Member
Sadly the supply of pull-offs from Delco or RP are pretty much exhausted. There are Chinese replacements that are all bright white plastic. Don't know if they work well. If anyone has a good 'closed GM dealer' parts find let me know.

John Lebetski
Woodstock, IL
77 Eleganza II
Re: [GMCnet] PowerNation TV bashes the Qjet [message #238613 is a reply to message #238477] Mon, 03 February 2014 10:21 Go to previous messageGo to next message
jhbridges is currently offline  jhbridges   United States
Messages: 8412
Registered: May 2011
Location: Braselton ga
Karma: -74
Senior Member
Just remember, God and Carter make good carburetors.  But you >do< want a manifold designed for whatever you're stuffing atop the engine.

--johnny





________________________________
From: John R. Lebetski <gransport@aol.com>
To: gmclist@temp.gmcnet.org
Sent: Sunday, February 2, 2014 10:20 AM
Subject: [GMCnet] PowerNation TV bashes the Qjet




First they bashed the Qjet for a couple minutes then went on to abandon it for a crusty Carter AFB. Putting a square to spread bore adaptor plate on is like a NASCAR restrictor plate on the primary side. They don't get the whole Qjet small primary venturi speed efficiency thing to say the least. Oy
--
John Lebetski
Chicago, IL
77 Eleganza II
Source America First
_______________________________________________
GMCnet mailing list
Unsubscribe or Change List Options:
http://temp.gmcnet.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/gmclist
_______________________________________________
GMCnet mailing list
Unsubscribe or Change List Options:
http://temp.gmcnet.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/gmclist



Foolish Carriage, 76 26' Eleganza(?) with beaucoup mods and add - ons. Braselton, Ga. I forgive them all, save those who hurt the dogs. They must answer to me in hell
Re: PowerNation TV bashes the Qjet [message #238623 is a reply to message #238477] Mon, 03 February 2014 11:29 Go to previous messageGo to next message
JohnL455 is currently offline  JohnL455   United States
Messages: 4447
Registered: October 2006
Location: Woodstock, IL
Karma: 12
Senior Member
There were even Carter Qjets when RP couldn't meet manufacturing demand.

John Lebetski
Woodstock, IL
77 Eleganza II
Re: [GMCnet] PowerNation TV bashes the Qjet [message #238626 is a reply to message #238513] Mon, 03 February 2014 11:48 Go to previous messageGo to next message
jhbridges is currently offline  jhbridges   United States
Messages: 8412
Registered: May 2011
Location: Braselton ga
Karma: -74
Senior Member
My 340 car with the Thermoquad opend all the way up would make you turn your head.

--johnny
'76 23' transmode norris





________________________________
From: David Orders <dao@oarsllc.com>
To: gmclist@temp.gmcnet.org
Sent: Sunday, February 2, 2014 1:53 PM
Subject: Re: [GMCnet] PowerNation TV bashes the Qjet




Kerry, there is something immensely satisfying about that QJet secondary roar. It's a sound from my younger days. The next time an SOB pulls up beside you on the freeway, look him in they eye and floor it.


..rrrRRRRAWRRRRRRRRRR!!!!!
--
1976 Royale "Twinkie II", 1978 Palm Beach with front end fire. Lynnwood WA - "We may not be able to stop all evil in the world, but I know that how we treat one another is entirely up to us."

_______________________________________________
GMCnet mailing list
Unsubscribe or Change List Options:
http://temp.gmcnet.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/gmclist
_______________________________________________
GMCnet mailing list
Unsubscribe or Change List Options:
http://temp.gmcnet.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/gmclist



Foolish Carriage, 76 26' Eleganza(?) with beaucoup mods and add - ons. Braselton, Ga. I forgive them all, save those who hurt the dogs. They must answer to me in hell
Re: [GMCnet] PowerNation TV bashes the Qjet [message #238633 is a reply to message #238477] Mon, 03 February 2014 12:17 Go to previous messageGo to next message
jhbridges is currently offline  jhbridges   United States
Messages: 8412
Registered: May 2011
Location: Braselton ga
Karma: -74
Senior Member
Just remember, God and Carter make good carburetors.  But you >do< want a manifold designed for whatever you're stuffing atop the engine.

--johnny




________________________________
From: John R. Lebetski <gransport@aol.com>
To: gmclist@temp.gmcnet.org
Sent: Sunday, February 2, 2014 10:20 AM
Subject: [GMCnet] PowerNation TV bashes the Qjet




First they bashed the Qjet for a couple minutes then went on to abandon it for a crusty Carter AFB. Putting a square to spread bore adaptor plate on is like a NASCAR restrictor plate on the primary side. They don't get the whole Qjet small primary venturi speed efficiency thing to say the least. Oy
--
John Lebetski
Chicago, IL
77 Eleganza II
Source America First
_______________________________________________
GMCnet mailing list
Unsubscribe or Change List Options:
http://temp.gmcnet.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/gmclist
_______________________________________________
GMCnet mailing list
Unsubscribe or Change List Options:
http://temp.gmcnet.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/gmclist



Foolish Carriage, 76 26' Eleganza(?) with beaucoup mods and add - ons. Braselton, Ga. I forgive them all, save those who hurt the dogs. They must answer to me in hell
icon14.gif  Re: [GMCnet] PowerNation TV bashes the Qjet [message #238772 is a reply to message #238633] Tue, 04 February 2014 16:17 Go to previous messageGo to next message
mikethebike is currently offline  mikethebike   United States
Messages: 331
Registered: January 2014
Karma: 0
Senior Member
OK, I'm a speed freak from the 1960's who grew up in Burlington, NC, worked at Sox & Martin when they ran 'A' Super-Stock before the Pro-Stock class came into being...Don Carlton (The Motown Missle) worked there at that time. I've had experience with Carter AFB (aluminum 4 barrel), Motorcraft, Holley, Webber side draft and down draft (305 cid Gurney-Weslake with 4 Webbers), SU, Stromberg 97's, S&S, Kehein side draft throttle plate and CV (Sportster), Ford Autolite INLINE- 4 barrel (1970 BOSS-302), the GM Quadra-jet and other brands I no longer can remember. Of all the 4 barrel carbs out their, the ONLY one that was licensed for use on the most expensive Mercedes Benz automobile during the 1970's was the GM Q-Jet. Why? According to the MBNA service boss it was the only carb out their that could be tuned to meet EPA, MPG, power, drivability and durability. NOTHING, short of electronic fuel injection could touch it.

If some jack-leg mechanic tells you a Q-Jet is junk, find another wrench.

Re: PowerNation TV bashes the Qjet [message #238778 is a reply to message #238512] Tue, 04 February 2014 16:40 Go to previous messageGo to previous message
mikethebike is currently offline  mikethebike   United States
Messages: 331
Registered: January 2014
Karma: 0
Senior Member
Kerry Pinkerton wrote on Sun, 02 February 2014 12:41






I'm thinking of wiring up a light that comes on when linkage moves to the point that the secondaries open.

I really had no real complaints driving on primaries only until I got to the mountains.

I love my Qjet.



The Q-Jet is a vacuum controlled secondary choke plate. It matters not where your throttle is positioned other than to change the vacuum signal to the diaphragm that controls the secondary choke and needles and the signal at that throttle plate position will change depending on conditions so using a mechanical gauge to determine secondary opening points is not the way to go.. I would recommend a high quality vacuum gauge for that.

You could also put the next stronger spring in to retard the secondary opening point. This would give you a little better MPG and you would still have all that torque at WOT.

The tuning method we used for any non-mechanical secondary carb other than the AFB which used a counter weighted plate, was to install the weakest secondary spring first and go out and stand on it from 1500. The engine will experience a lean-out bog and fall down. (you might remember guys back in the 60's would install a screw in the linkage on a vacuum carb to force the secondaries open too soon and when they hit it the engine would fall down and then slowly build rpm....sounded neat, but slowed you down big time) You then go up one step at a time until you can go WOT at 1500 and experience NO bog...just get-up-and-go!! That is the spring you want.
Previous Topic: [GMCnet] Replacement Wankel rotor for BBC
Next Topic: Master Cylinder Cover
Goto Forum:
  


Current Time: Sun Nov 17 08:42:49 CST 2024

Total time taken to generate the page: 0.07374 seconds